Come on! Economists beat magicians anytime!
https://teespring.com/econ-04?p=share#pid=377&cid=100069&sid=front
Ouch…
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx
Should have, could have, would have…
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-03-16/return-of-the-governator-and-linking-brains
Them polite analysts
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-03-13/manipulating-data-and-middle-age-loneliness
Bonds: emerging versus developed.
https://www.bondvigilantes.com/blog/2017/03/14/three-popular-charts/
Europe in 2035? (via alphaville)
https://twitter.com/evghenia_v/status/840987370283503617
This one is important…
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/08/business/economy/labor-share-economic-output.html
Worries, worries, worries.
All fake news, apparently
See? Those polls are always wrong (but not always in the same direction)
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/03/daily-chart-10
I am not sure whether this data is reliable or not, but it looks nice anyway
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-new-force-on-wall-street-family-offices-1488991396
Mmmm. This does not look very promising for the US
https://www.businessinsider.nl/brunswick-survey-on-attitudes-towards-business-2017-3/
The end of secular stagnation?
https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21718500-improving-economic-data-do-not-necessarily-indicate-underlying-health-end
An interesting bit of reading on acquisitions
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/03/13/2185852/trouble-ahead-for-pe-investors/
Not fifty, but three ways to leave your lover
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-euro-breakup-or-saved/
Bitcoin, blockchain and trouble
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-13/bitcoin-miners-signal-revolt-in-push-to-fix-sluggish-blockchain
China. Really, this will not disappear all of a sudden.
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/03/16/2186119/china-treads-closer-to-a-day-of-debt-reckoning/
A complete overview of all previous editions of Best of the Web Weekly Economics can be found here http://bit.ly/16dkN6i. All links provided are collected from public websites, unless otherwise specified. I have not checked the data or information for accuracy used, and therefore do not guarantee that all data provided will be 100% correct. The links provided do not necessarily reflect my personal opinion and should be seen as general interest: oftentimes I do not agree with arguments presented, but nevertheless think it is worthwhile to read them. It is up to the reader to make up their own mind. Suggestions or discussions are more than welcome. Do not quote unless specifically cleared beforehand!
Pingback: Best of the Web: 17-03-23 nr 1632 | Best of the Web