Best of the Web: 15-01-06, nr 1137

Good morning. There goes 50 for oil (spot West Texas): do I hear 40, anyone?http://www.crossingwallstreet.com/archives/2015/01/oil-drops-below-50.html

And the sell-off in stocks has ended a 87 year old record
gxydnhr6MIIW8fILqZzr-7yPsEzsJ3iNnZ0O4aeFkFpDog3qn3X3Vc7vyrA6uQ2TUKvDT6kg9C9mECl5t7jPHfRcq2eQjKZkuLF23-PH3ma-AuF-VR5pWhRZ-B9_emPV7A
http://uk.businessinsider.com/the-sp-500-four-losing-days-2015-1

A bit late, but here it is: the best of the last week of 2014
GZZG2P6LR8MGlTlC3zrxETYGx0Ak4rEEBWGzVOMyRv9lbBAzXJuQTUa98j-iw6otI2XgfiLSaw2ywuPErd3gahZg24RI_e0I8l0Fk9WpBTzOqEt3vPzEbV1LsWxZeFBZmQ
https://lukasdaalder.com/2015/01/06/best-in-economics-this-week-december-26/

Ok, how high do you score on the resolution score?
chalabi-new-year-datalab-chart-3
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-05/ritholtzs-reads-good-times-and-bad-lessons

This year’s scorecard?
7ImndHZXwnEYpxTYwHB5gfPWOALAmq9OlgIUX5RrC274N05ATcWHW6Mkn8Thq2qCJ_HXmcOq7IVj9PSTMLC13pBaSdKiNcESUwm5NtIeYRFRsdY668zPUeYkaFJa_FH3Tg
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/01/daily-chart

Talk of bubbles does not realy lead to a burst
ZENMGnMDsRPV__T4j_z0tBcqgn62rRBdgHBKCzMokPxZFGpUPM-eWU3bfL4qLnYdSTg5vPRiDeAK7qu2pHMny7ZKMR8NZrgszKfn_j9PKxzNxm-F60UQS74oDqrWoB0skQ
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Sometimes-talk-of-a-tech-bubble-is-mostly-babble-5991129.php

Cool chart on shopping malls in the US
8qyU4LGOwEcvUaUglAl6DihC1LfHh5FYiDcURAHdY0U5EIpx3eM3GUS0412VqGBHq7mSmlkAqYsabuvIIQU4CyFrnIdzzR6TpQtvv5o-kQUPj6ocDcY1MUISXOqLjh5vHA
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/business/the-economics-and-nostalgia-of-dead-malls.html

A complete overview of all previous editions of Best of the Web can be found herehttp://tinyurl.com/c8ge4c5. All links provided are collected from public websites, unless otherwise specified. I have not checked the data or information for accuracy used, and therefore do not guarantee that all data provided will be 100% correct. The links provided do not necessarily reflect my personal opinion and should be seen as general interest: oftentimes I do not agree with arguments presented, but nevertheless think it is worthwhile to read them. It is up to the reader to make up their own mind. Suggestions or discussions are more than welcome. Do not quote unless specifically cleared beforehand!

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s