Good morning. Why call it a bubble, right?

https://www.bespokepremium.com/think-big-blog/u-s-losing-share-as-china-hong-kong-gain/

And speaking of bubbles: this is a very cool animation on the Nasdaq roller coaster ride. Watch the PE’s!

http://graphics.wsj.com/3d-nasdaq/

The ECB’s buying program has not lead to the expected further spread compression just yet…

http://www.wsj.com/articles/investors-hunt-bargains-in-european-corporate-bonds-1429033188

Interesting question: “Why risk is hard to measure”
http://www.voxeu.org/article/why-risk-hard-measure

Is this the result of the ultralow interest rates?

http://jpkoning.blogspot.nl/2015/04/plumbing-depths-of-effective-lower-bound.html

European earnings: not as good as some claim them to be…

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/04/24/2127707/charting-european-profits-hope-vs-evidence/

Not much of a surprise, but here you go: men want daughters to be more independent than their wives

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/04/27/the-disturbing-differences-in-what-men-want-in-their-wives-and-their-daughters/

More on Greece and the refinancing of the debt

http://uk.businessinsider.com/europe-says-time-is-running-out-for-greece-eurogroup-riga-2015-4

Living on the 98th floor…

http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/04/daily-chart-13

Some more on that traditionally weak first quarter

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/upshot/why-you-cant-put-faith-in-reports-of-first-quarter-economic-slumps.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&abt=0002&abg=0

Oh, and let’s not forget about the volcano either… (via @diederickRaven)

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-32429214
http://www.reuters.com/news/picture/editors-choice

And this week’s schedule!
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2015/04/schedule-for-week-of-april-26-2015.html

A complete overview of all previous editions of Best of the Web can be found herehttp://tinyurl.com/c8ge4c5. All links provided are collected from public websites, unless otherwise specified. I have not checked the data or information for accuracy used, and therefore do not guarantee that all data provided will be 100% correct. The links provided do not necessarily reflect my personal opinion and should be seen as general interest: oftentimes I do not agree with arguments presented, but nevertheless think it is worthwhile to read them. It is up to the reader to make up their own mind. Suggestions or discussions are more than welcome. Do not quote unless specifically cleared beforehand!